ROM vs. NTSD
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ROM is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
ROM vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROM
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 45.36%
- YTD
- 77.72%
- 6M
- 74.45%
- 1Y
- 152.07%
- 3Y*
- 59.24%
- 5Y*
- 31.70%
- 10Y*
- 42.70%
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROM vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 96.35% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and NTSD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
NTSD
ROM vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 5.08 | -4.54 |
Drawdowns
ROM vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -5.20% | -78.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -1.11% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -0.84% | -20.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.55% | — | — |
Volatility
ROM vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.83% | 24.28% | +17.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.63% | 24.28% | +27.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.82% | 24.28% | +25.54% |
ROM vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROM vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.14% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROM and NTSD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
ROM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for ROM and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer