PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROM vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROM vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 77.72% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed KORU with an annualized return of 42.70%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively lower 19.62% annualized return.


ROM

1D
-2.01%
1M
45.36%
YTD
77.72%
6M
74.45%
1Y
152.07%
3Y*
59.24%
5Y*
31.70%
10Y*
42.70%

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROM vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
77.72%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and KORU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.55

The correlation between ROM and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROM vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROM
KORU

Technology

55.2%
52.3%

Financial Services

3.0%
16.7%

Energy

0.1%
1.4%

Industrials

0.0%
20.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.8%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

ROM
55.2%
KORU
52.3%

Financial Services

ROM
3.0%
KORU
16.7%

Energy

ROM
0.1%
KORU
1.4%

Industrials

ROM
0.0%
KORU
20.4%

Basic Materials

ROM

-

KORU
2.0%

Communication Services

ROM

-

KORU
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ROM

-

KORU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

ROM

-

KORU
1.8%

Healthcare

ROM

-

KORU
3.5%

Real Estate

ROM

-

KORU

-

Utilities

ROM

-

KORU
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROM vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROMKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.72

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

35.65

-30.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

112.99

-98.52

ROM vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROMKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66

17.63

-13.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.28

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.25

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.13

+0.41

Drawdowns

ROM vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.36%

-95.79%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.33%

-61.39%

+29.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.10%

-73.71%

+25.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.55%

-93.35%

+25.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.55%

-95.79%

+28.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-5.39%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-57.53%

+36.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

19.33%

-8.78%

Volatility

ROM vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is 14.00%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that ROM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.00%

60.18%

-46.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.37%

110.71%

-77.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.83%

124.15%

-82.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.63%

85.11%

-33.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.82%

79.91%

-30.09%

ROM vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROM vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, which matches KORU's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%0.00%0.00%
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.14%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROM and KORU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to ROM (14.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.70% vs 19.62% for KORU. On fees, ROM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 14.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.70% return vs 19.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

ROM and KORU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.14%.

ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROM and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer