ROM vs. BRKL
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ROM is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
ROM vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 68.85%
- YTD
- 54.22%
- 1Y
- 82.51%
- 3Y*
- 50.06%
- 5Y*
- 22.37%
- 10Y*
- 38.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.35%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.20K | $16.10K | $16.10K | |
| $9.10M | $7.79M | $10.49M |
ROM vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 1.14% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and BRKL is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROM vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROM | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROM vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -7.03% | -76.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.97% | 0.00% | -14.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -3.57% | -17.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.92% | — | — |
Volatility
ROM vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.92% | 29.20% | +22.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.46% | 29.20% | +24.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 29.20% | +21.47% |
ROM vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROM vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.06% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROM and BRKL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
ROM has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for ROM and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer