ROM vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROM returned 45.24%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

ROM vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 48.40% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 28.75% return.

ROM

• 1D: -4.84%
• 1M: -4.75%
• 6M: 43.03%
• YTD: 48.40%
• 1Y: 80.90%
• 3Y*: 45.24%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 39.61%

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROM vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	48.40%	35.63%	31.65%	130.70%	-16.63%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.36

The correlation between ROM and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (1 year) to -0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ROM vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM

ROM Risk / Return Rank: 57
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROM	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.56	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.13	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.72	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	6.78	+0.22

ROM vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROM vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROM	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.36%	-92.16%	+8.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.33%	-25.28%	-7.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.10%	-84.63%	+36.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.18%	-85.94%	+67.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.84%	-68.34%	+47.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.59%	10.11%	+1.48%

Volatility

ROM vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 22.09% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 11.38%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROM	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.09%	11.38%	+10.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.79%	34.25%	+7.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.04%	44.14%	+4.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.89%	52.28%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.37%	52.28%	-1.91%

ROM vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROM vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	0.06%	0.24%	0.21%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.16%	0.30%	0.08%	0.20%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROM and BITI in my portfolio?

ROM and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROM or BITI?

ROM has higher volatility (22.09%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, ROM or BITI?

On 3-year performance, ROM leads with 45.24% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, ROM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROM or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, ROM has performed better with a 45.24% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROM or BITI?

ROM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROM or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.06% for ROM.

What is the main difference between ROM and BITI?

ROM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.