ROM vs. ^SIXT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT).

ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.

Performance

ROM vs. ^SIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROM vs. ^SIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	-16.84%	35.63%	31.65%	130.70%	-63.86%	77.75%	80.42%	102.10%	-9.89%	81.11%
^SIXT Technology Select Sector Index	-7.65%	23.84%	20.79%	54.58%	-28.72%	34.18%	42.21%	48.04%	-2.96%	32.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a -16.84% return, which is significantly lower than ^SIXT's -7.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed ^SIXT with an annualized return of 31.73%, while ^SIXT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.56% annualized return.

ROM

• 1D: 8.36%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: -16.84%
• 6M: -15.35%
• 1Y: 47.16%
• 3Y*: 31.37%
• 5Y*: 14.97%
• 10Y*: 31.73%

^SIXT

• 1D: 4.27%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: -7.65%
• 6M: -5.71%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 14.44%
• 10Y*: 19.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ROM vs. ^SIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM

ROM Risk / Return Rank: 57
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 49

^SIXT

^SIXT Risk / Return Rank: 74
^SIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
^SIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
^SIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
^SIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
^SIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. ^SIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROM	^SIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.06	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.63	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.79	-0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.42	5.75	-1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROM vs. ^SIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the ^SIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and ^SIXT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROM	^SIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	1.06	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.59	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.80	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.80	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and ^SIXT is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

ROM vs. ^SIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than ^SIXT's maximum drawdown of -33.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and ^SIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROM	^SIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.36%	-33.93%	-49.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.33%	-16.12%	-16.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.55%	-33.93%	-33.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.55%	-33.93%	-33.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.67%	-12.54%	-14.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.02%	-5.04%	-15.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.81%	5.02%	+5.79%

Volatility

ROM vs. ^SIXT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT) at 8.11%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROM	^SIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.01%	8.11%	+7.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.95%	16.53%	+16.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.78%	27.18%	+26.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.32%	24.90%	+26.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.50%	24.48%	+25.02%