ROL vs. VT
ROL (Rollins, Inc.) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, ROL returned 13.16%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for VT. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ROL vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -36.33% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 13.16%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.
ROL
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- 6M
- -39.67%
- YTD
- -36.33%
- 1Y
- -33.42%
- 3Y*
- -0.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.13%
VT
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $317.75M | $256.01M | $222.88M | |
| $425.08M | $369.63M | $481.55M |
ROL vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -36.33% | 31.06% | 7.56% | 21.19% | 8.10% | -11.43% | 78.47% | -6.95% | 17.61% | 39.61% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.15% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROL and VT is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.49 |
The correlation between ROL and VT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROL vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
ROL
VT
ROL vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.29 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 2.29 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.03 | 9.54 | -11.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROL vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -50.27% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.75% | -9.67% | -32.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.75% | -16.51% | -25.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.75% | -26.38% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | -34.24% | -7.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.75% | -1.84% | -39.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -6.97% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.22% | 2.32% | +13.90% |
Volatility
ROL vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a higher volatility of 12.48% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.99%. This indicates that ROL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.48% | 3.99% | +8.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 11.68% | +10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.67% | 13.96% | +12.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 16.22% | +8.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 17.18% | +8.14% |
Dividends
ROL vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.88% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROL and VT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROL has higher volatility (12.48%) compared to VT (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROL and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer