PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROL vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROL achieves a -20.87% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ROL has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 15.58%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.36% annualized return.


ROL

1D
0.30%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
-20.87%
6M
-20.91%
1Y
-16.61%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
15.58%

AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROL vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
-20.87%31.06%7.56%21.19%8.10%-11.43%78.47%-6.95%17.61%39.61%
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ROL and AAPL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between ROL and AAPL has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROL:

$22.72B

AAPL:

$4.30T

EPS

ROL:

$1.10

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

ROL:

43.09

AAPL:

35.35

PEG Ratio

ROL:

3.90

AAPL:

4.65

PS Ratio

ROL:

5.93

AAPL:

9.60

PB Ratio

ROL:

16.44

AAPL:

40.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROL:

$3.84B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROL:

$1.53B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROL:

$859.94M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROL vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROL
ROL Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ROL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ROL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROLAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.38

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

3.40

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.58

8.47

-10.05

ROL vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROL and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROL drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROL and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROLAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.27%

-81.80%

+24.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.90%

-13.80%

-17.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-33.36%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.90%

-33.36%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.90%

-38.52%

+7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.60%

-7.64%

-19.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-29.59%

+17.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.53%

5.53%

+5.00%

Volatility

ROL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.73%. This indicates that ROL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROLAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

6.73%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.67%

16.53%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.16%

22.64%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.59%

27.52%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

28.92%

-3.88%

Dividends

ROL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

ROL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
1.51%1.13%1.33%1.24%1.18%1.23%0.84%1.42%1.03%1.20%1.18%1.62%

Financials

ROL vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rollins, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
906.42M
111.18B
(ROL) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROL vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rollins, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
49.3%
Portfolio components
ROL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

ROL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

ROL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROL and AAPL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROL has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROL dropped -57.27% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROL and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer