ROKU vs. PATH
ROKU (Roku, Inc.) and PATH (UiPath Inc.) are both stocks. ROKU operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while PATH operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ROKU returned -17.87%/yr vs -31.72%/yr for PATH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ROKU vs. PATH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROKU achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -31.42% return.
ROKU
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 22.15%
- 1Y
- 63.89%
- 3Y*
- 24.75%
- 5Y*
- -17.87%
- 10Y*
- —
PATH
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- -31.42%
- 6M
- -39.80%
- 1Y
- -15.23%
- 3Y*
- -16.72%
- 5Y*
- -31.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ROKU vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKU Roku, Inc. | 12.69% | 45.94% | -18.90% | 125.21% | -82.16% | -36.01% |
PATH UiPath Inc. | -31.42% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -37.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROKU and PATH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ROKU and PATH has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ROKU:
$18.46B
PATH:
$5.93B
ROKU:
$1.34
PATH:
$0.61
ROKU:
91.54
PATH:
18.54
ROKU:
3.71
PATH:
3.63
ROKU:
6.91
PATH:
3.12
ROKU:
$4.97B
PATH:
$1.67B
ROKU:
$2.19B
PATH:
$1.39B
ROKU:
$280.30M
PATH:
$115.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROKU vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank
ROKU
PATH
ROKU vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roku, Inc. (ROKU) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROKU | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.01 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | -0.30 | +2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | -0.54 | +7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROKU | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | -0.24 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | -0.50 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.47 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
ROKU vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROKU drawdown since its inception was -91.91%, roughly equal to the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKU and PATH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROKU | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.91% | -88.98% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.69% | -51.37% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -65.10% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.91% | -87.66% | -4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.50% | -86.80% | +12.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.81% | -73.74% | +20.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 28.04% | -18.31% |
Volatility
ROKU vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roku, Inc. (ROKU) is 8.97%, while UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a volatility of 20.16%. This indicates that ROKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROKU | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 20.16% | -11.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.25% | 48.43% | -17.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.71% | 63.54% | -18.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.60% | 63.64% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.38% | 64.26% | +9.12% |
Dividends
ROKU vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROKU nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ROKU vs. PATH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roku, Inc. and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROKU vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison
ROKU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a gross profit of 564.94M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.
PATH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.
ROKU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
PATH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
ROKU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
PATH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROKU and PATH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (20.16%) compared to ROKU (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKU dropped -91.91% vs PATH's -88.98%.
ROKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROKU and PATH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer