ROKT vs. POW
ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROKT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. ROKT is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ROKT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
ROKT vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ROKT having a 33.82% return and POW slightly higher at 34.20%.
ROKT
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- YTD
- 33.82%
- 1Y
- 70.00%
- 3Y*
- 38.88%
- 5Y*
- 23.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.72%
POW
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- YTD
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.23M | $2.16M | $2.93M | |
| $4.57M | $3.69M | $5.95M |
ROKT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 33.82% | 4.82% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 34.20% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROKT and POW is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROKT vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
ROKT
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROKT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROKT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROKT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROKT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.16% | -28.02% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.74% | -21.15% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -5.60% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | — | — |
Volatility
ROKT vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROKT | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.49% | 34.35% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 34.35% | -10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.50% | 34.35% | -8.85% |
ROKT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROKT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROKT and POW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
ROKT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for ROKT and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer