PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROKT vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROKT vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's 16.24% return.


ROKT

1D
-3.71%
1M
12.62%
YTD
46.55%
6M
60.20%
1Y
111.37%
3Y*
44.75%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*

KARS

1D
-3.32%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
16.24%
6M
17.45%
1Y
69.84%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
46.55%50.56%27.89%14.41%-0.81%4.63%7.99%40.90%-13.20%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
16.24%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and KARS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.55

The correlation between ROKT and KARS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROKT vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROKT
KARS

Industrials

67.6%
21.9%

Technology

20.2%
17.2%

Energy

6.4%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

34.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

ROKT
67.6%
KARS
21.9%

Technology

ROKT
20.2%
KARS
17.2%

Energy

ROKT
6.4%
KARS

-

Communication Services

ROKT
5.9%
KARS

-

Basic Materials

ROKT

-

KARS
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ROKT

-

KARS
34.3%

Consumer Defensive

ROKT

-

KARS

-

Financial Services

ROKT

-

KARS

-

Healthcare

ROKT

-

KARS

-

Real Estate

ROKT

-

KARS

-

Utilities

ROKT

-

KARS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROKT vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROKTKARSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.88

2.71

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.47

3.33

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.43

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.82

6.97

+2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.81

19.68

+16.12

ROKT vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROKTKARSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88

2.71

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

-0.08

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.20

+0.66

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKTKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-64.85%

+21.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-10.08%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-47.79%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-64.85%

+41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-29.15%

+20.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-28.32%

+21.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.56%

-0.44%

Volatility

ROKT vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 9.00%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKTKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

9.00%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.98%

18.66%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.89%

25.97%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

29.78%

-7.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.14%

29.29%

-4.15%

ROKT vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROKT vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than KARS's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.16%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.27%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROKT and KARS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to KARS (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs -2.35% for KARS. On fees, ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, KARS has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs -2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROKT is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

ROKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.

ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.72% for KARS.

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROKT and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer