PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RODM vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RODM vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RODM having a 11.60% return and VEU slightly higher at 12.16%. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed VEU with an annualized return of 9.13%, while VEU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.62% annualized return.


RODM

1D
-0.83%
1M
-0.57%
6M
9.31%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
22.95%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
9.13%

VEU

1D
-1.80%
1M
-1.68%
6M
7.61%
YTD
12.16%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
11.60%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
12.16%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and VEU is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.85

The correlation between RODM and VEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RODM vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RODM
VEU

Financial Services

26.7%
22.6%

Industrials

16.2%
15.0%

Healthcare

10.8%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.0%

Technology

6.8%
21.6%

Basic Materials

5.4%
7.1%

Energy

5.3%
4.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
4.5%

Utilities

4.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.9%

Financial Services

RODM
26.7%
VEU
22.6%

Industrials

RODM
16.2%
VEU
15.0%

Healthcare

RODM
10.8%
VEU
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

RODM
7.8%
VEU
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RODM
7.1%
VEU
8.0%

Technology

RODM
6.8%
VEU
21.6%

Basic Materials

RODM
5.4%
VEU
7.1%

Energy

RODM
5.3%
VEU
4.7%

Communication Services

RODM
5.2%
VEU
4.5%

Utilities

RODM
4.5%
VEU
3.0%

Real Estate

RODM
3.4%
VEU
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RODM vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RODMVEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.26

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

8.51

+4.22

RODM vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RODM vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and VEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RODMVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-61.52%

+25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-11.43%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-13.69%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-29.14%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

-34.98%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-3.79%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-13.07%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

3.04%

-1.23%

Volatility

RODM vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.13%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RODMVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

6.27%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

14.76%

-5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

16.68%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.45%

16.32%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

17.04%

-2.07%

RODM vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RODM vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than VEU's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.85%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.58%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


RODM and VEU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEU has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to RODM (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 9.62% vs 9.13% for RODM. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 9.62% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.58% for VEU.

RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.04% for VEU.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer