RODM vs. PSP
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.24%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for PSP. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for PSP.
Performance
RODM vs. PSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than PSP's -11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has outperformed PSP with an annualized return of 9.24%, while PSP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
PSP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -10.38%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
RODM vs. PSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -11.42% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and PSP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between RODM and PSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RODM vs. PSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RODM
PSP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
RODM
PSP
Industrials
RODM
PSP
Technology
RODM
PSP
Healthcare
RODM
PSP
Energy
RODM
PSP
-
Basic Materials
RODM
PSP
Consumer Cyclical
RODM
PSP
-
Communication Services
RODM
PSP
Utilities
RODM
PSP
-
Consumer Defensive
RODM
PSP
Real Estate
RODM
PSP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. PSP — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
PSP
RODM vs. PSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.97 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | -0.24 | +3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | -0.54 | +14.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. PSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum PSP drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and PSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -85.40% | +49.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -22.37% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -22.94% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -47.16% | +18.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | -47.16% | +11.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -15.75% | +14.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -30.67% | +24.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 10.12% | -8.34% |
Volatility
RODM vs. PSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.58%, while Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 7.43% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 16.48% | -7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 20.15% | -9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 23.85% | -10.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 22.47% | -7.25% |
RODM vs. PSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PSP's 1.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. PSP - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than PSP's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.52% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and PSP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs PSP's -85.40%.
On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.24% vs 8.12% for PSP. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 2.78% for RODM.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PSP is Global Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 1.44% for PSP.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and PSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer