PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RODM vs. IYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RODM vs. IYH

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.24%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for IYH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.

Performance

RODM vs. IYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RODM having a 9.24% annualized return and IYH not far ahead at 9.63%.

RODM

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
12.64%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
9.24%

IYH

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.37%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-1.60%
1Y
14.30%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF		11.64%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-1.10%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and IYH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.54

The correlation between RODM and IYH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RODM vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RODM
IYH

Financial Services

25.9%

-

Industrials

16.6%

-

Technology

10.8%

-

Healthcare

8.9%
100.0%

Energy

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

6.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Utilities

4.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Financial Services

RODM
25.9%
IYH

-

Industrials

RODM
16.6%
IYH

-

Technology

RODM
10.8%
IYH

-

Healthcare

RODM
8.9%
IYH
100.0%

Energy

RODM
6.8%
IYH

-

Basic Materials

RODM
6.4%
IYH

-

Consumer Cyclical

RODM
5.8%
IYH

-

Communication Services

RODM
5.5%
IYH

-

Utilities

RODM
4.9%
IYH

-

Consumer Defensive

RODM
4.0%
IYH

-

Real Estate

RODM
3.5%
IYH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

Often compared with RODM:
RODM vs. NSRIXRODM vs. GLOFRODM vs. VEARODM vs. SCHFRODM vs. VYMIRODM vs. SPMORODM vs. IVLU
Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IBB

Return for Risk

RODM vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RODMIYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.33
0.95

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.26
1.53

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.35

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

3.21

+11.10

RODM vs. IYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the IYH Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and IYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RODM vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum IYH drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and IYH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RODMIYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-43.12%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-10.64%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-17.91%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-17.91%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

-28.40%

-7.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-4.38%

+3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-8.96%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

4.46%

-2.68%

Volatility

RODM vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.58%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RODMIYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

4.97%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

10.61%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

15.11%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

14.97%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.75%

-1.53%

RODM vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

RODM vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than IYH's 1.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.51%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF		2.78%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

RODM and IYH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYH has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs IYH's -43.12%.

On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.63% vs 9.24% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.51% for IYH.

RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.43% for IYH.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and IYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer