RODM vs. IWP

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.30%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for IWP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.

Performance

RODM vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed IWP with an annualized return of 9.30%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.

RODM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

IWP

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 5.92%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 5.82%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	12.24%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-9.97%	25.14%
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	2.86%	8.45%	21.86%	25.70%	-26.90%	12.60%	35.25%	35.04%	-4.89%	24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and IWP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.63

The correlation between RODM and IWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RODM vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RODM	IWP
Financial Services	25.9%	6.3%
Industrials	16.6%	25.2%
Technology	10.8%	22.7%
Healthcare	8.9%	13.2%
Energy	6.8%	3.9%
Basic Materials	6.4%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	19.3%
Communication Services	5.5%	3.1%
Utilities	4.9%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	1.9%
Real Estate	3.5%	1.4%

Return for Risk

RODM vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 81
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

IWP

IWP Risk / Return Rank: 13
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 13
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RODM	IWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	0.27	+2.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	0.50	+2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.06	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	0.31	+3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.22	0.89	+13.33

RODM vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RODM vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and IWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RODM	IWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.98%	-56.92%	+20.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-14.79%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.58%	-25.20%	+14.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.85%	-38.62%	+9.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.98%	-38.62%	+2.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-2.95%	+2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-9.68%	+3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	5.10%	-3.32%

Volatility

RODM vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.54%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RODM	IWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	5.68%	-2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	13.34%	-4.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.02%	17.03%	-6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.47%	22.37%	-8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	21.71%	-6.50%

RODM vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

RODM vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.33%	0.37%	0.40%	0.54%	0.77%	0.30%	0.38%	0.59%	1.02%	0.78%	1.16%	0.98%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.77%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RODM and IWP in my portfolio?

RODM and IWP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RODM or IWP?

IWP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs IWP's -56.92%.

Which ETF is better, RODM or IWP?

On 10-year performance, IWP leads with 12.47% vs 9.30% for RODM. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RODM or IWP?

Over the 10-year period, IWP has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RODM or IWP?

IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RODM or IWP?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.

What is the main difference between RODM and IWP?

RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.23% for IWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.