RODM vs. IJR
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.30%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for IJR. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
RODM vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 9.30%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.
RODM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
IJR
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
RODM vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 12.24% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.73% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and IJR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between RODM and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
RODM vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RODM
IJR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
RODM
IJR
Industrials
RODM
IJR
Technology
RODM
IJR
Healthcare
RODM
IJR
Energy
RODM
IJR
Basic Materials
RODM
IJR
Consumer Cyclical
RODM
IJR
Communication Services
RODM
IJR
Utilities
RODM
IJR
Consumer Defensive
RODM
IJR
Real Estate
RODM
IJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
IJR
RODM vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.97 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 13.35 | +0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -58.15% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -8.68% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -28.02% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -28.02% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | -44.36% | +8.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -9.27% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.59% | -0.81% |
Volatility
RODM vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.54%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 5.18% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 11.97% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 17.76% | -6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 21.43% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 22.92% | -7.71% |
RODM vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than IJR's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.11% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.77% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and IJR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJR has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 11.16% vs 9.30% for RODM. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.11% for IJR.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.06% for IJR.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer