RODM vs. HTAB
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB).
RODM and HTAB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RODM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. HTAB is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018.
Performance
RODM vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RODM vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 7.69% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -11.51% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 0.51% | 2.86% | 1.52% | 7.16% | -8.33% | -0.12% | 5.41% | 7.86% | 1.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than HTAB's 0.51% return.
RODM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 32.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
HTAB
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RODM vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
HTAB
RODM vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 0.59 | +1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 0.81 | +2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.13 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 0.77 | +2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | 1.92 | +14.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 0.59 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.12 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.42 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and HTAB is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RODM vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than HTAB's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.89% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.92% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RODM vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than HTAB's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and HTAB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -14.76% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -4.51% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -14.76% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -1.81% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -2.93% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.81% | +0.18% |
Volatility
RODM vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 1.69%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 1.69% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 2.57% | +5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 5.66% | +7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 5.70% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 5.19% | +10.02% |