RODM vs. HTAB
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while HTAB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Hartford. RODM is passively managed, while HTAB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RODM returned 9.68%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for HTAB. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.
Performance
RODM vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than HTAB's 1.59% return.
RODM
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
HTAB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
RODM vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.53% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -11.51% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 1.59% | 2.86% | 1.52% | 7.16% | -8.33% | -0.12% | 5.41% | 7.86% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and HTAB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2018 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, RODM and HTAB have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
HTAB
RODM vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 2.37 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 7.48 | +7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.68 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.12 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
RODM vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than HTAB's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and HTAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -14.76% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -2.85% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -8.42% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -14.76% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.76% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.38% | -2.89% | -3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 0.90% | +0.86% |
Volatility
RODM vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 1.24%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 1.24% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 2.80% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 4.02% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 5.74% | +7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 5.17% | +10.07% |
RODM vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than HTAB's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.83% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.79% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and HTAB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RODM has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to HTAB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs HTAB's -14.76%.
On 5-year performance, RODM leads with 9.68% vs 0.71% for HTAB. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HTAB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.79% for RODM.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HTAB is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.39% for HTAB.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and HTAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer