HTAB vs. CRUX
HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) and CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTAB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CRUX.
Performance
HTAB vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HTAB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAB vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 0.87% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTAB and CRUX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTAB vs. CRUX — Risk / Return Rank
HTAB
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTAB vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTAB | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTAB vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTAB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAB and CRUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTAB | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -1.85% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.50% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -0.60% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility
HTAB vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTAB | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 4.10% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 4.10% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 4.10% | +1.05% |
HTAB vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CRUX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTAB vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison
HTAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than CRUX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.83% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTAB and CRUX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HTAB and 0.32% for CRUX.
Find the right allocation for HTAB and CRUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer