RODM vs. HMOP
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP).
RODM and HMOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RODM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. HMOP is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Dec 13, 2017.
Performance
RODM vs. HMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RODM vs. HMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 6.61% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 1.93% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | -0.10% | 4.70% | 2.52% | 6.83% | -8.37% | 1.80% | 5.52% | 7.77% | 1.59% | 0.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than HMOP's -0.10% return.
RODM
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
HMOP
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RODM vs. HMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RODM and HMOP have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. HMOP — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
HMOP
RODM vs. HMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RODM | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.36 | 1.17 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 1.53 | +1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.25 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 1.47 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | 4.83 | +10.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RODM | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.17 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.34 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and HMOP is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RODM vs. HMOP - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than HMOP's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.92% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 3.51% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 2.92% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 5.26% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RODM vs. HMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than HMOP's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and HMOP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -13.12% | -22.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -3.10% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -13.12% | -15.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | -2.38% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -2.49% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 0.94% | +1.04% |
Volatility
RODM vs. HMOP - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) at 1.08%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 1.08% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 1.78% | +6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 3.73% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 3.85% | +9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 4.29% | +10.92% |