ROCQ vs. FDL
ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ROCQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. ROCQ is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
ROCQ vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROCQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
ROCQ vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 15.07% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROCQ and FDL is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROCQ vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
ROCQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
ROCQ vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROCQ | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROCQ vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROCQ | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -65.93% | +60.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -3.40% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -9.63% | +8.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
ROCQ vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROCQ | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 11.55% | +7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 14.31% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 17.11% | +2.34% |
ROCQ vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROCQ vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FDL's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.71% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 2.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROCQ and FDL have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 2.08% for ROCQ.
ROCQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for ROCQ and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer