PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBT vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 10.34% return.


ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*

QARP

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.39%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.57%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBT vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-11.38%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
10.34%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and QARP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.78

The correlation between ROBT and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROBT vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBT
QARP

Technology

57.0%
21.9%

Industrials

20.4%
9.0%

Healthcare

7.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
13.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
14.7%

Financial Services

1.6%
9.9%

Energy

1.5%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
10.5%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Technology

ROBT
57.0%
QARP
21.9%

Industrials

ROBT
20.4%
QARP
9.0%

Healthcare

ROBT
7.4%
QARP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ROBT
6.6%
QARP
13.2%

Communication Services

ROBT
4.1%
QARP
14.7%

Financial Services

ROBT
1.6%
QARP
9.9%

Energy

ROBT
1.5%
QARP
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

ROBT
1.4%
QARP
10.5%

Basic Materials

ROBT

-

QARP
2.1%

Real Estate

ROBT

-

QARP
0.6%

Utilities

ROBT

-

QARP
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBTQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.46

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

15.79

-11.70

ROBT vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBTQARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.43

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.78

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.72

-0.37

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBTQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-35.44%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-7.26%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-15.65%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-22.75%

-20.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-0.98%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-4.44%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

1.59%

+5.94%

Volatility

ROBT vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.21%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBTQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

2.21%

+4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.51%

7.71%

+9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.32%

10.36%

+12.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

15.51%

+9.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

19.65%

+5.83%

ROBT vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBT vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.03%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBT and QARP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to QARP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.06% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

ROBT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBT and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer