ROBT vs. CLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX).
ROBT and CLIX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROBT is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. It was launched on Feb 21, 2018. CLIX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2017. Both ROBT and CLIX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROBT vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROBT vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | -9.80% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -13.98% |
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -11.38% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -39.96% | 90.91% | 17.32% | -9.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly higher than CLIX's -11.38% return.
ROBT
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -9.80%
- 6M
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- 14.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CLIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -10.90%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- -8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROBT vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ROBT and CLIX have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
ROBT vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank
ROBT
CLIX
ROBT vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBT | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.72 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.09 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 2.45 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBT | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.72 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | -0.32 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.15 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBT and CLIX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ROBT vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison
ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.60% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROBT vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and CLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBT | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.47% | -73.21% | +28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.66% | -19.57% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.26% | -68.22% | +24.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.02% | -47.65% | +27.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -34.54% | +18.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 6.76% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ROBT vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) at 7.71%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROBT | CLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 7.71% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.27% | 16.27% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.73% | 22.90% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 27.03% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.50% | 26.03% | -0.53% |