ROBO vs. DRIV
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO returned 7.13%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
ROBO vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 29.33% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 29.33%
- 6M
- 30.40%
- 1Y
- 59.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 29.33% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -23.04% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and DRIV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ROBO and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBO vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBO
DRIV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ROBO
DRIV
Technology
ROBO
DRIV
Healthcare
ROBO
DRIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROBO
DRIV
Financial Services
ROBO
DRIV
-
Consumer Defensive
ROBO
DRIV
-
Communication Services
ROBO
DRIV
Basic Materials
ROBO
-
DRIV
Energy
ROBO
-
DRIV
-
Real Estate
ROBO
-
DRIV
-
Utilities
ROBO
-
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
DRIV
ROBO vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.55 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 6.92 | -3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | 24.10 | -10.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 3.70 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.35 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -41.93% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -13.43% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -34.18% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -41.93% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.04% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -15.13% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 3.85% | +0.48% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 7.64%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 9.36% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 19.29% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.01% | 25.14% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 27.07% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 27.40% | -4.24% |
ROBO vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than DRIV's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO and DRIV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to ROBO (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 9.49% vs 7.13% for ROBO. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.33% for ROBO.
ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while DRIV is Global Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer