PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 29.33% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.


ROBO

1D
-0.77%
1M
10.56%
YTD
29.33%
6M
30.40%
1Y
59.43%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
13.65%

DRIV

1D
-1.04%
1M
12.34%
YTD
42.27%
6M
41.87%
1Y
92.43%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
29.33%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-23.04%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
42.27%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%28.54%-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and DRIV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.89

The correlation between ROBO and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBO
DRIV

Industrials

46.8%
19.4%

Technology

41.9%
34.0%

Healthcare

4.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
26.8%

Financial Services

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.3%

-

Communication Services

1.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

14.4%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

ROBO
46.8%
DRIV
19.4%

Technology

ROBO
41.9%
DRIV
34.0%

Healthcare

ROBO
4.9%
DRIV

-

Consumer Cyclical

ROBO
3.1%
DRIV
26.8%

Financial Services

ROBO
2.2%
DRIV

-

Consumer Defensive

ROBO
1.3%
DRIV

-

Communication Services

ROBO
1.1%
DRIV
5.4%

Basic Materials

ROBO

-

DRIV
14.4%

Energy

ROBO

-

DRIV

-

Real Estate

ROBO

-

DRIV

-

Utilities

ROBO

-

DRIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBODRIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

6.92

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

24.10

-10.32

ROBO vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBODRIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

3.70

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.35

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.54

-0.05

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and DRIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBODRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-41.93%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-13.43%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-34.18%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-41.93%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.04%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-15.13%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.85%

+0.48%

Volatility

ROBO vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 7.64%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBODRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

9.36%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

19.29%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

25.14%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

27.07%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

27.40%

-4.24%

ROBO vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than DRIV's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.75%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.33%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO and DRIV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to ROBO (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 9.49% vs 7.13% for ROBO. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.33% for ROBO.

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while DRIV is Global Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.68% for DRIV.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO and DRIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer