ROBO vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. ROBO is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROBO returned 12.64%/yr vs 48.02%/yr for CHAT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

ROBO vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 57.97% return.

ROBO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 19.75%
• 6M: 18.31%
• 1Y: 47.52%
• 3Y*: 12.64%
• 5Y*: 5.51%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

CHAT

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 57.97%
• 6M: 60.59%
• 1Y: 113.65%
• 3Y*: 48.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	19.75%	23.71%	-1.28%	6.56%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	57.97%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and CHAT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.79

The correlation between ROBO and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBO	CHAT
Industrials	45.3%	0.9%
Technology	43.6%	76.9%
Healthcare	4.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	5.6%
Financial Services	1.9%	0.0%
Communication Services	1.4%	16.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ROBO vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO

ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 61
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBO	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	3.34	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	3.60	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.50	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	6.79	-4.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	19.03	-9.15

ROBO vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBO	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.65%	-31.34%	-12.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-16.28%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.92%	-31.34%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.12%	-9.97%	+1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-5.39%	-7.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	5.80%	-1.27%

Volatility

ROBO vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 10.66%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBO	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	16.40%	-5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.92%	28.00%	-8.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.56%	33.14%	-8.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	30.65%	-6.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	30.65%	-7.35%

ROBO vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBO vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than CHAT's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.80%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	0.35%	0.42%	0.55%	0.05%	0.00%	0.18%	0.20%	0.37%	0.37%	0.02%	0.19%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBO and CHAT in my portfolio?

ROBO and CHAT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBO or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to ROBO (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, ROBO or CHAT?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 48.02% vs 12.64% for ROBO. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBO or CHAT?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 48.02% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBO or CHAT?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBO or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.35% for ROBO.

What is the main difference between ROBO and CHAT?

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while CHAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.