PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO vs. BITQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 29.33% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 39.79% return.


ROBO

1D
-0.77%
1M
10.56%
YTD
29.33%
6M
30.40%
1Y
59.43%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
13.65%

BITQ

1D
-2.21%
1M
11.04%
YTD
39.79%
6M
21.39%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
58.56%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
29.33%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%17.50%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
39.79%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and BITQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.63

The correlation between ROBO and BITQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. BITQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBO
BITQ

Industrials

46.8%

-

Technology

41.9%
28.1%

Healthcare

4.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
4.8%

Financial Services

2.2%
67.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%

-

Communication Services

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

ROBO
46.8%
BITQ

-

Technology

ROBO
41.9%
BITQ
28.1%

Healthcare

ROBO
4.9%
BITQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

ROBO
3.1%
BITQ
4.8%

Financial Services

ROBO
2.2%
BITQ
67.1%

Consumer Defensive

ROBO
1.3%
BITQ

-

Communication Services

ROBO
1.1%
BITQ

-

Basic Materials

ROBO

-

BITQ

-

Energy

ROBO

-

BITQ

-

Real Estate

ROBO

-

BITQ

-

Utilities

ROBO

-

BITQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBOBITQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

1.35

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

2.84

+10.94

ROBO vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and BITQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBOBITQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.08

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.08

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.07

+0.43

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and BITQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBOBITQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-90.32%

+46.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-44.99%

+27.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-51.22%

+23.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-90.32%

+46.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-14.06%

+13.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-52.80%

+39.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

21.32%

-16.99%

Volatility

ROBO vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 7.64%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 14.73%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBOBITQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

14.73%

-7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

42.74%

-24.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

56.05%

-33.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

67.17%

-43.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

67.23%

-44.07%

ROBO vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.33%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO and BITQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITQ has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to ROBO (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs BITQ's -90.32%.

On 5-year performance, ROBO leads with 7.13% vs 5.19% for BITQ. On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while BITQ is Technology Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.85% for BITQ.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO and BITQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer