PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO.AS achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 19.50% return.


ROBO.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.34%
6M
8.00%
YTD
14.93%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.56%

IS3N.DE

1D
1.13%
1M
-7.99%
6M
12.27%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
8.55%
ALL TIME*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBO.AS
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
14.93%9.16%5.54%20.30%-30.09%25.18%33.61%31.81%-16.99%12.61%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
19.50%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%7.07%20.99%-11.06%8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO.AS and IS3N.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.72

The correlation between ROBO.AS and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO.AS
ROBO.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ROBO.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBO.ASIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.06

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

9.15

-2.56

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO.AS and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.38%, roughly equal to the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.AS and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBO.ASIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.38%

-35.06%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-10.59%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.83%

-19.18%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.38%

-21.99%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-9.59%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-9.23%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.55%

+0.83%

Volatility

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 8.16%. This indicates that ROBO.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBO.ASIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

8.16%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

17.35%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

19.66%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.77%

16.71%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

18.19%

+3.46%

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO.AS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO.AS vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBO.AS nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO.AS and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.AS.

ROBO.AS is categorized as Robotics, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. ROBO.AS tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.AS and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO.AS and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer