IS3N.DE vs. EEM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM).
IS3N.DE and EEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IS3N.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on May 30, 2014. EEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2003. Both IS3N.DE and EEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IS3N.DE or EEM.
Key characteristics
| IS3N.DE | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.45% | 7.60% |
| 1Y Return | 9.45% | 12.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.10% | -3.52% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.39% | 2.90% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.46% | 2.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.91% | 14.48% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.06% | -66.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.06% | -20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3N.DE and EEM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IS3N.DE vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than EEM's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3N.DE has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 4.46%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IS3N.DE vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IS3N.DE vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IS3N.DE vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.42% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 1.88% | 2.48% | 2.22% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
IS3N.DE vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and EEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IS3N.DE vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) is 3.98%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that IS3N.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.