PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROBO.AS is traded in EUR, while BOTZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOTZ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO.AS achieves a 31.08% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 12.48% return.


ROBO.AS

1D
-0.05%
1M
11.97%
YTD
31.08%
6M
32.13%
1Y
57.10%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.67%
YTD
12.48%
6M
14.52%
1Y
26.95%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBO.AS
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
31.08%9.16%5.54%20.30%-30.09%25.18%33.61%31.81%-16.99%13.09%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
12.48%0.62%19.67%34.80%-39.14%16.77%39.40%34.78%-24.98%18.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO.AS and BOTZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.67

The correlation between ROBO.AS and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO.AS
ROBO.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ROBO.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBO.ASBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.21

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

1.60

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

4.99

+10.53

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO.AS and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBO.ASBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.18

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.16

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.44

+0.09

Drawdowns

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.38%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -47.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.AS and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBO.ASBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.38%

-47.08%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-16.89%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.83%

-32.72%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.38%

-47.08%

+10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-2.37%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-14.89%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

5.42%

-1.77%

Volatility

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) have volatilities of 7.28% and 7.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBO.ASBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

7.04%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

17.08%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

23.05%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

25.28%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

25.23%

-3.75%

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO.AS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO.AS vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

ROBO.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
ROBO.AS
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO.AS and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.AS.

ROBO.AS tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.AS and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO.AS and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer