IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE).
IS3N.DE and EUNM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IS3N.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on May 30, 2014. EUNM.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both IS3N.DE and EUNM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.98% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
EUNM.DE iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.40% | 19.18% | 14.09% | 5.71% | -14.47% | 4.68% | 6.84% | 20.91% | -10.84% | 19.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than EUNM.DE's 6.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IS3N.DE having a 8.23% annualized return and EUNM.DE not far behind at 7.99%.
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 24.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
EUNM.DE
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IS3N.DE and EUNM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3N.DE
EUNM.DE
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3N.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.92 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.55 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 8.71 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3N.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.28 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.33 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3N.DE and EUNM.DE is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3N.DE nor EUNM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and EUNM.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3N.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -35.91% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -13.46% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.01% | -23.62% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -31.86% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -7.34% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -10.64% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.06% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IS3N.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) have volatilities of 7.46% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IS3N.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 7.52% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 13.14% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 18.32% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 16.22% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 18.04% | -0.16% |