ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L
ROBO.AS (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO.AS is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO.AS returned 8.35%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for SSAC.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROBO.AS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSAC.L.
Performance
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROBO.AS is traded in EUR, while SSAC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSAC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO.AS achieves a 31.08% return, which is significantly higher than SSAC.L's 12.99% return.
ROBO.AS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 31.08%
- 6M
- 32.13%
- 1Y
- 57.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 12.99%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO.AS L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 31.08% | 9.16% | 5.54% | 20.30% | -30.09% | 25.18% | 33.61% | 31.81% | -16.99% | 13.09% |
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.99% | 8.00% | 25.41% | 18.60% | -13.27% | 28.18% | 5.73% | 29.85% | -5.96% | 4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO.AS and SSAC.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ROBO.AS and SSAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO.AS
SSAC.L
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBO.AS | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 4.00 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 16.62 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBO.AS | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.39 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.90 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.84 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.38%, which is greater than SSAC.L's maximum drawdown of -32.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.AS and SSAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO.AS | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.38% | -32.87% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -6.70% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.83% | -20.21% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.38% | -20.21% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.39% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -4.38% | -7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 1.62% | +2.03% |
Volatility
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that ROBO.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO.AS | SSAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 2.68% | +4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 8.01% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 11.28% | +10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 13.80% | +7.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 15.04% | +6.44% |
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO.AS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO.AS vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROBO.AS nor SSAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO.AS and SSAC.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.AS.
ROBO.AS is categorized as Robotics, while SSAC.L is Global Equities. ROBO.AS tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index, while SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.AS and 0.20% for SSAC.L.
Find the right allocation for ROBO.AS and SSAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer