ROBN vs. XYZG
ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ROBN returned -29.65% vs -15.62% for XYZG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XYZG.
Performance
ROBN vs. XYZG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -60.08% return, which is significantly lower than XYZG's -3.28% return.
ROBN
- 1D
- -12.05%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- -60.08%
- 6M
- -72.54%
- 1Y
- -29.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYZG
- 1D
- -11.57%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- -15.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBN vs. XYZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -60.08% | 571.38% |
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF | -3.28% | 21.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBN and XYZG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ROBN and XYZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBN vs. XYZG — Risk / Return Rank
ROBN
XYZG
ROBN vs. XYZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBN | XYZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.23 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | -0.42 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBN | XYZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | -0.17 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.15 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
ROBN vs. XYZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than XYZG's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and XYZG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBN | XYZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.84% | -69.40% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.84% | -69.40% | -17.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.36% | -45.04% | -36.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -29.06% | -14.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.11% | 37.60% | +15.51% |
Volatility
ROBN vs. XYZG - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 41.47% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) at 25.78%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBN | XYZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.47% | 25.78% | +15.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.22% | 70.80% | +30.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.84% | 92.87% | +44.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.35% | 103.71% | +48.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 152.35% | 103.71% | +48.64% |
ROBN vs. XYZG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XYZG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBN vs. XYZG - Dividend Comparison
ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than XYZG's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 11.22% | 4.48% |
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF | 6.92% | 6.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBN and XYZG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBN has higher volatility (41.47%) compared to XYZG (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs XYZG's -69.40%.
On 1-year performance, XYZG leads with -15.62% vs -29.65% for ROBN. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XYZG has performed better with a -15.62% return vs -29.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 6.92% for XYZG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.75% for XYZG.
XYZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBN and XYZG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer