PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBN vs. XYZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBN vs. XYZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -60.08% return, which is significantly lower than XYZG's -3.28% return.


ROBN

1D
-12.05%
1M
10.71%
YTD
-60.08%
6M
-72.54%
1Y
-29.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYZG

1D
-11.57%
1M
-8.12%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
8.21%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. XYZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ROBN
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF
-60.08%571.38%
XYZG
Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF
-3.28%21.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and XYZG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.54

The correlation between ROBN and XYZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBN vs. XYZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN
ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XYZG
XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. XYZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBNXYZGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.05

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

-0.23

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

-0.42

-0.14

ROBN vs. XYZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBN Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is comparable to the XYZG Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBN and XYZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBNXYZGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

-0.17

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.15

-0.18

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. XYZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than XYZG's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and XYZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBNXYZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.84%

-69.40%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.84%

-69.40%

-17.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.36%

-45.04%

-36.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-29.06%

-14.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.11%

37.60%

+15.51%

Volatility

ROBN vs. XYZG - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 41.47% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) at 25.78%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBNXYZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.47%

25.78%

+15.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.22%

70.80%

+30.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.84%

92.87%

+44.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.35%

103.71%

+48.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

152.35%

103.71%

+48.64%

ROBN vs. XYZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XYZG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBN vs. XYZG - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than XYZG's 6.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROBN and XYZG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBN has higher volatility (41.47%) compared to XYZG (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs XYZG's -69.40%.

On 1-year performance, XYZG leads with -15.62% vs -29.65% for ROBN. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XYZG has performed better with a -15.62% return vs -29.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 6.92% for XYZG.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.75% for XYZG.

XYZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBN and XYZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer