ROBN vs. QTAP

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ROBN returned -29.71% vs 21.22% for QTAP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

ROBN vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -27.36% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.38% return.

ROBN

• 1D: 4.19%
• 1M: 32.51%
• 6M: -34.60%
• YTD: -27.36%
• 1Y: -29.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 13.89%
• YTD: 14.38%
• 1Y: 21.22%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	-27.36%	124.78%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.38%	17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and QTAP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	0.56

The correlation between ROBN and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ROBN vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN

ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 10
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBN	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	3.43	-3.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	5.54	-4.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.84	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	8.56	-8.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	43.97	-44.48

ROBN vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBN Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBN and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBN	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.84%	-29.44%	-57.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.84%	-2.49%	-84.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.08%	-0.35%	-65.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.38%	-4.95%	-40.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.38%	0.48%	+57.90%

Volatility

ROBN vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 37.14% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.60%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBN	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.14%	2.60%	+34.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	105.20%	5.22%	+99.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.91%	6.21%	+132.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	150.94%	18.92%	+132.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	150.94%	18.63%	+132.31%

ROBN vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBN vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	6.17%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBN and QTAP in my portfolio?

ROBN and QTAP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBN or QTAP?

ROBN has higher volatility (37.14%) compared to QTAP (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, ROBN or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.22% vs -29.71% for ROBN. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBN or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.22% return vs -29.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBN or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBN or QTAP?

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between ROBN and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.