ROAM vs. FFRHX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both funds - ROAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. ROAM is passively managed, while FFRHX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROAM returned 8.43%/yr vs 4.82%/yr for FFRHX. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ROAM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ROAM has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.82% annualized return.

ROAM

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -4.43%
• 6M: 8.48%
• YTD: 16.88%
• 1Y: 32.86%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 8.43%
• ALL TIME*: 6.09%

FFRHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 2.01%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 1Y: 4.94%
• 3Y*: 6.51%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 4.82%
• ALL TIME*: 3.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	$526.05K	$557.47K	$1.05M

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	16.88%	32.08%	6.21%	21.28%	-14.78%	9.32%	2.24%	8.89%	-12.24%	27.69%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	2.14%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and FFRHX is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.26

Return for Risk

ROAM vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROAM

ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 78
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROAM	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.30	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	5.37	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.81	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	4.51	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.07	14.73	-5.66

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAM and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROAM	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.47%	-22.20%	-23.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-1.19%	-9.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.79%	-3.29%	-13.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.07%	-5.90%	-21.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.47%	-22.20%	-23.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.51%	-0.11%	-9.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	-1.14%	-9.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	0.36%	+3.25%

Volatility

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.22%. This indicates that ROAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROAM	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	0.22%	+5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.79%	1.69%	+14.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	2.34%	+15.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.71%	2.89%	+12.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	4.13%	+13.81%

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROAM vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FFRHX's 6.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	6.39%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.50%	3.17%	4.15%	5.40%	5.23%	4.22%	3.04%	3.55%	2.54%	1.84%	1.89%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROAM and FFRHX in my portfolio?

ROAM and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROAM or FFRHX?

ROAM has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to FFRHX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAM dropped -45.47% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.