PortfoliosLab logo
DUK vs. SO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DUK and SO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

DUK vs. SO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) and The Southern Company (SO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DUK:

0.95

SO:

0.83

Sortino Ratio

DUK:

1.51

SO:

1.32

Omega Ratio

DUK:

1.18

SO:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

DUK:

1.65

SO:

1.25

Martin Ratio

DUK:

4.10

SO:

2.98

Ulcer Index

DUK:

4.66%

SO:

5.57%

Daily Std Dev

DUK:

18.42%

SO:

18.98%

Max Drawdown

DUK:

-71.92%

SO:

-38.43%

Current Drawdown

DUK:

-5.43%

SO:

-4.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DUK:

$90.12B

SO:

$97.60B

EPS

DUK:

$6.03

SO:

$4.17

PE Ratio

DUK:

19.23

SO:

21.27

PEG Ratio

DUK:

2.83

SO:

3.73

PS Ratio

DUK:

2.95

SO:

3.50

PB Ratio

DUK:

1.76

SO:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

DUK:

$30.94B

SO:

$27.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DUK:

$20.44B

SO:

$12.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

DUK:

$15.13B

SO:

$13.58B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUK achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than SO's 8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DUK has underperformed SO with an annualized return of 8.78%, while SO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


DUK

YTD

9.90%

1M

-2.52%

6M

5.56%

1Y

17.31%

5Y*

11.86%

10Y*

8.78%

SO

YTD

8.68%

1M

-1.95%

6M

2.58%

1Y

15.63%

5Y*

15.30%

10Y*

11.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DUK vs. SO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DUK is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DUK is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DUK is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DUK is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DUK is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DUK is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SO is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SO is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SO is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SO is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SO is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SO is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DUK vs. SO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) and The Southern Company (SO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DUK Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the SO Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUK and SO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DUK vs. SO - Dividend Comparison

DUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SO's 3.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%3.77%
SO
The Southern Company
3.25%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%4.24%

Drawdowns

DUK vs. SO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUK drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, which is greater than SO's maximum drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUK and SO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DUK vs. SO - Volatility Comparison

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to The Southern Company (SO) at 6.60%. This indicates that DUK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DUK vs. SO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Duke Energy Corporation and The Southern Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
8.25B
7.78B
(DUK) Total Revenue
(SO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DUK vs. SO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Duke Energy Corporation and The Southern Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
51.9%
48.1%
(DUK) Gross Margin
(SO) Gross Margin
DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.28B and revenue of 8.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.74B and revenue of 7.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.34B and revenue of 8.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 7.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 8.25B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 7.78B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.