RNRG vs. PBD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) and PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - RNRG tracks the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index while PBD tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RNRG returned 4.47%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for PBD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RNRG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBD.

Performance

RNRG vs. PBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly lower than PBD's 38.50% return. Over the past 10 years, RNRG has underperformed PBD with an annualized return of 4.47%, while PBD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.

RNRG

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 17.51%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: -2.70%
• 10Y*: 4.47%

PBD

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 38.50%
• 6M: 39.82%
• 1Y: 92.04%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: -3.66%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRG vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	17.66%	29.61%	-22.00%	-12.82%	-15.30%	-12.78%	26.67%	37.04%	-6.22%	21.16%
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	38.50%	43.65%	-26.39%	-10.69%	-29.70%	-22.30%	145.46%	40.00%	-19.32%	28.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and PBD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.65

The correlation between RNRG and PBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNRG vs. PBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNRG	PBD
Utilities	92.8%	12.0%
Industrials	3.0%	48.1%
Technology	2.2%	6.8%
Basic Materials	2.1%	3.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.9%
Energy	-	12.4%
Financial Services	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 84
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PBD

PBD Risk / Return Rank: 94
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRG vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNRG	PBD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	3.96	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	4.64	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.61	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.20	8.65	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.98	26.96	-6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNRG vs. PBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is lower than the PBD Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and PBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNRG	PBD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	3.96	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	-0.13	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.35	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.03	+0.04

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, smaller than the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and PBD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	PBD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-78.60%	+19.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-10.70%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	-52.45%	+17.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	-69.15%	+16.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	-75.40%	+16.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.37%	-39.02%	+8.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-53.40%	+28.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	3.43%	-1.29%

Volatility

RNRG vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 5.55%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	PBD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	8.57%	-3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	17.00%	-4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	23.41%	-7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.10%	28.37%	-8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	27.26%	-7.59%

RNRG vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNRG vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than PBD's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	1.63%	2.71%	1.81%	2.85%	2.98%	0.67%	0.48%	1.83%	1.86%	1.76%	2.04%	1.24%
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.28%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNRG and PBD in my portfolio?

RNRG and PBD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNRG or PBD?

PBD has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to RNRG (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNRG dropped -58.79% vs PBD's -78.60%.

Which ETF is better, RNRG or PBD?

On 10-year performance, PBD leads with 9.45% vs 4.47% for RNRG. On fees, RNRG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNRG or PBD?

Over the 10-year period, PBD has performed better with a 9.45% return vs 4.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNRG or PBD?

RNRG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNRG or PBD?

PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.28% for RNRG.

What is the main difference between RNRG and PBD?

RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.75% for PBD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.