PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RNRG vs. CNRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and CNRG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

RNRG vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-13.99%
-0.04%
RNRG
CNRG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RNRG:

-0.77

CNRG:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

RNRG:

-0.97

CNRG:

0.48

Omega Ratio

RNRG:

0.88

CNRG:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

RNRG:

-0.26

CNRG:

0.10

Martin Ratio

RNRG:

-1.61

CNRG:

0.72

Ulcer Index

RNRG:

9.09%

CNRG:

7.96%

Daily Std Dev

RNRG:

19.03%

CNRG:

30.70%

Max Drawdown

RNRG:

-55.43%

CNRG:

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

RNRG:

-54.58%

CNRG:

-54.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's 4.66% return.


RNRG

YTD

-0.52%

1M

-1.19%

6M

-14.92%

1Y

-14.36%

5Y*

-9.61%

10Y*

N/A

CNRG

YTD

4.66%

1M

4.11%

6M

0.22%

1Y

5.67%

5Y*

7.04%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RNRG vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.


RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
Expense ratio chart for RNRG: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for CNRG: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RNRG vs. CNRG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNRG is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNRG is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNRG is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNRG is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNRG is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNRG is 00
Martin Ratio Rank

CNRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNRG is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RNRG vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RNRG, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.770.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for RNRG, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.970.48
The chart of Omega ratio for RNRG, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.500.881.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for RNRG, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.260.10
The chart of Martin ratio for RNRG, currently valued at -1.61, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.610.72
RNRG
CNRG

The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and CNRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.77
0.19
RNRG
CNRG

Dividends

RNRG vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than CNRG's 1.28% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
1.48%1.47%1.43%1.15%1.10%3.17%2.96%5.24%4.14%5.02%3.48%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.28%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-54.58%
-54.70%
RNRG
CNRG

Volatility

RNRG vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 5.28%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.28%
9.95%
RNRG
CNRG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab