RNR vs. SPMO
RNR (RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, RNR returned 11.75%/yr vs 20.18%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RNR vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a 15.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 11.75%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.18% annualized return.
RNR
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
SPMO
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- YTD
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 38.38%
- 5Y*
- 20.75%
- 10Y*
- 20.18%
RNR vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 15.22% | 13.73% | 27.76% | 7.22% | 9.86% | 3.07% | -14.70% | 47.76% | 7.54% | -6.94% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 21.12% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNR and SPMO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.23 |
The correlation between RNR and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNR vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
RNR
SPMO
RNR vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.18 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 7.42 | +1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNR vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.67% | -30.95% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.27% | -12.70% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -20.13% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.71% | -22.74% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -30.95% | -9.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -10.99% | +10.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.23% | -4.60% | -5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 3.73% | +0.35% |
Volatility
RNR vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is 9.22%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.56%. This indicates that RNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 11.56% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.64% | 20.23% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 22.61% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.80% | 20.32% | +7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 20.83% | +6.16% |
Dividends
RNR vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
RNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SPMO's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.63% | 0.78% | 0.80% | 0.85% | 0.84% | 0.69% | 0.99% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.06% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNR and SPMO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to RNR (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNR dropped -45.67% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
RNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNR and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer