RNR vs. MET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RNR (RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — RNR in Insurance - Reinsurance, MET in Insurance - Life. Over the past 10 years, RNR returned 10.18%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for MET. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RNR vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than MET's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has underperformed MET with an annualized return of 10.18%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.

RNR

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -7.17%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 5.63%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 14.58%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: 10.18%

MET

• 1D: -2.25%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: 4.08%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 5.13%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNR vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.	-0.05%	13.73%	27.76%	7.22%	9.86%	3.07%	-14.70%	47.76%	7.54%	-6.94%
MET MetLife, Inc.	4.08%	-0.80%	27.68%	-5.49%	19.23%	37.43%	-3.42%	28.84%	-15.77%	21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RNR and MET is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2000	0.38

Fundamentals

EPS RNR : $67.75 MET : $7.21
PE Ratio RNR : 4.14 MET : 11.24
PEG Ratio RNR : 0.06 MET : 0.37
PS Ratio RNR : 1.12 MET : 0.53
Total Revenue (TTM) RNR : $11.49B MET : $76.95B
Gross Profit (TTM) RNR : $5.12B MET : $14.75B
EBITDA (TTM) RNR : $4.18B MET : $4.11B

Return for Risk

RNR vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNR

RNR Risk / Return Rank: 58
RNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RNR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
RNR Martin Ratio Rank: 67

MET

MET Risk / Return Rank: 45
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNR vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNR	MET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	0.23	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	0.45	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.06	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	0.30	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.25	0.80	+2.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNR vs. MET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the MET Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNR and MET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNR	MET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	0.23	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.28	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.41	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.26	+0.29

Drawdowns

RNR vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and MET.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNR	MET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.67%	-82.37%	+36.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.27%	-17.46%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.10%	-21.97%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.71%	-35.09%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.66%	-55.16%	+14.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.97%	-4.20%	-6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-17.64%	+7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	6.42%	-2.34%

Volatility

RNR vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is 5.36%, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that RNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNR	MET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	5.98%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.38%	17.26%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.35%	22.89%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.52%	25.69%	+1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.81%	30.69%	-3.88%

Dividends

RNR vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

RNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than MET's 2.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MET MetLife, Inc.	2.83%	2.85%	2.63%	3.12%	2.74%	3.04%	3.88%	3.41%	4.04%	14.52%	2.92%	3.06%
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.	0.57%	0.57%	0.63%	0.78%	0.80%	0.85%	0.84%	0.69%	0.99%	1.02%	0.91%	1.06%

Financials

RNR vs. MET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and MetLife, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 13.75K and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 581.80M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNR and MET in my portfolio?

RNR and MET have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNR or MET?

MET has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to RNR (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNR dropped -45.67% vs MET's -82.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.