PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RNR vs. MET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RNRMET
YTD Return31.75%28.82%
1Y Return27.99%37.81%
3Y Return (Ann)19.21%12.28%
5Y Return (Ann)7.88%14.83%
10Y Return (Ann)10.94%8.19%
Sharpe Ratio0.981.76
Sortino Ratio1.392.19
Omega Ratio1.191.33
Calmar Ratio1.632.16
Martin Ratio4.5510.39
Ulcer Index5.36%3.51%
Daily Std Dev24.91%20.80%
Max Drawdown-45.67%-82.93%
Current Drawdown-9.36%-3.14%

Fundamentals


RNRMET
Market Cap$13.70B$56.92B
EPS$70.98$4.93
PE Ratio3.7216.67
PEG Ratio-3.130.14
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.39B$71.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)$12.43B$71.35B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.23B$5.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between RNR and MET is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RNR vs. MET - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than MET's 28.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has outperformed MET with an annualized return of 10.94%, while MET has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.37%
12.99%
RNR
MET

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RNR vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RNR, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RNR, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RNR, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RNR, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RNR, currently valued at 4.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.55
MET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MET, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MET, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MET, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MET, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MET, currently valued at 10.39, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.39

RNR vs. MET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the MET Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNR and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.98
1.76
RNR
MET

Dividends

RNR vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

RNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than MET's 2.63% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
0.60%0.78%0.80%0.85%0.84%0.69%0.99%1.02%0.91%1.06%1.19%1.15%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RNR vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and MET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.36%
-3.14%
RNR
MET

Volatility

RNR vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is 7.47%, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that RNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.47%
9.81%
RNR
MET

Financials

RNR vs. MET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items