PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNR vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RNR vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's 10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has underperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 10.18%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.59% annualized return.


RNR

1D
1.05%
1M
-7.17%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
5.63%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
10.18%

^SP500TR

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.02%
YTD
10.89%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNR vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
-0.05%13.73%27.76%7.22%9.86%3.07%-14.70%47.76%7.54%-6.94%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
10.89%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RNR and ^SP500TR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1995

0.33

The correlation between RNR and ^SP500TR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNR vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNR
RNR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNR Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNR vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNR^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

2.37

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

3.24

-2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.17

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.25

14.81

-11.57

RNR vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNR and ^SP500TR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNR^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.37

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.87

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.65

-0.10

Drawdowns

RNR vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum ^SP500TR drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and ^SP500TR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNR^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.67%

-55.25%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-8.89%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-18.75%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

-24.49%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-33.79%

-6.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.97%

-0.74%

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-8.17%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

1.90%

+2.18%

Volatility

RNR vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 2.93%. This indicates that RNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNR^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

2.93%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

8.99%

+6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

11.89%

+10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

16.90%

+10.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.81%

18.07%

+8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNR and ^SP500TR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNR has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to ^SP500TR (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNR dropped -45.67% vs ^SP500TR's -55.25%.

^SP500TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNR and ^SP500TR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer