PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.


RNR

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.51%
6M
13.27%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
16.95%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
14.83%

VOO

1D
1.42%
1M
1.69%
6M
9.53%
YTD
11.72%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.17%
ALL TIME*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.12M$118.75M$114.11M
$3.97B$3.80B$5.49B

RNR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
14.62%13.73%27.76%7.22%9.86%3.07%-14.70%47.76%7.54%-6.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RNR and VOO is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.37

The correlation between RNR and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNR
RNR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNRVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.63

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

11.23

-2.94

RNR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNRVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.67%

-33.99%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-8.90%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-18.69%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

-24.52%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-33.99%

-6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

0.00%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-3.67%

-6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.08%

+1.99%

Volatility

RNR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that RNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNRVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

3.81%

+5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.36%

10.18%

+8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.37%

12.80%

+11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.85%

16.95%

+10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

18.02%

+9.04%

Dividends

RNR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
0.50%0.57%0.63%0.78%0.80%0.85%0.84%0.69%0.99%1.02%0.91%1.06%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNR and VOO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNR has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNR dropped -45.67% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer