PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNP vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNP achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RNP has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 8.84%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.02% annualized return.


RNP

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.16%
YTD
7.41%
6M
9.84%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
8.84%

VTI

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
7.41%2.57%11.88%7.73%-19.95%32.84%3.31%43.14%-9.46%19.65%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.62%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RNP and VTI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2003

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between RNP and VTI has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNP
RNP Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNPVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.35

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

2.79

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

12.52

-12.44

RNP vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNP Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNP and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNP drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNP and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNPVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.93%

-55.45%

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-8.92%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-19.30%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-25.36%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.68%

-35.00%

-21.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-2.14%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-8.02%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

1.99%

+3.46%

Volatility

RNP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNPVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.50%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

9.82%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

12.64%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

17.47%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

18.33%

+5.90%

Dividends

RNP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

RNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
7.96%8.22%7.81%8.10%13.26%5.20%6.52%6.25%8.36%7.00%7.75%8.03%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNP and VTI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNP has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNP dropped -86.93% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNP and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer