RNP vs. CEFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).
CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RNP or CEFS.
Correlation
The correlation between RNP and CEFS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RNP vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RNP:
0.99
CEFS:
2.43
RNP:
1.42
CEFS:
3.29
RNP:
1.18
CEFS:
1.43
RNP:
0.86
CEFS:
4.24
RNP:
3.10
CEFS:
13.53
RNP:
5.39%
CEFS:
1.86%
RNP:
16.84%
CEFS:
10.39%
RNP:
-87.10%
CEFS:
-38.99%
RNP:
-7.10%
CEFS:
-0.44%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RNP having a 5.90% return and CEFS slightly lower at 5.71%.
RNP
5.90%
4.05%
0.89%
17.89%
5.60%
9.81%
CEFS
5.71%
1.72%
9.20%
24.84%
11.71%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RNP vs. CEFS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RNP
CEFS
RNP vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RNP vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
RNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, less than CEFS's 9.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 7.47% | 7.81% | 8.10% | 13.26% | 5.20% | 6.52% | 6.25% | 8.36% | 7.00% | 7.75% | 8.03% | 6.79% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 9.34% | 9.81% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 7.56% | 9.84% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RNP vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNP drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNP and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RNP vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) have volatilities of 3.29% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.