RNP vs. CEFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).
CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RNP or CEFS.
Key characteristics
| RNP | CEFS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.33% | 12.29% |
| 1Y Return | 18.79% | 27.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.43% | 9.97% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.44% | 11.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.97 | 2.34 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.27% | 11.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.10% | -38.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.82% | -1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNP and CEFS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RNP vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RNP achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 12.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RNP vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RNP vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
RNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than CEFS's 8.49% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 8.26% | 8.10% | 13.26% | 5.20% | 6.52% | 6.25% | 8.36% | 7.00% | 7.75% | 8.03% | 6.79% | 7.64% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 8.49% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 7.56% | 9.81% | 6.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RNP vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNP drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNP and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RNP vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 2.72%. This indicates that RNP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.