RNP vs. UTF
RNP (Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, RNP returned 7.90%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for UTF. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
RNP vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNP achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, RNP has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 7.90%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
RNP
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 0.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.96%
UTF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.73M | $1.82M | $2.20M | |
| $6.45M | $6.34M | $7.48M |
RNP vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 7.80% | 2.57% | 11.88% | 7.73% | -19.95% | 32.84% | 3.31% | 43.14% | -9.46% | 19.65% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 20.28% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNP and UTF is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2004 | 0.52 |
The correlation between RNP and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RNP:
$981.60M
UTF:
$2.69B
RNP:
$3.11
UTF:
$6.79
RNP:
6.58
UTF:
4.09
RNP:
0.02
UTF:
0.03
RNP:
6.55
UTF:
6.96
RNP:
0.99
UTF:
0.94
RNP:
$149.86M
UTF:
$387.16M
RNP:
$180.36M
UTF:
$388.42M
RNP:
$141.38M
UTF:
$765.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNP vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
RNP
UTF
RNP vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNP | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.41 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 2.88 | -3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNP vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNP drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNP and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNP | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.93% | -72.62% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -10.33% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -19.00% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -30.28% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.68% | -52.53% | -4.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -1.00% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -10.30% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 5.05% | +0.28% |
Volatility
RNP vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.59%. This indicates that RNP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNP | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.59% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.43% | 7.98% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 12.46% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 18.20% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 23.30% | +0.95% |
Dividends
RNP vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
RNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than UTF's 6.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 7.98% | 8.22% | 7.81% | 8.10% | 13.26% | 5.20% | 6.52% | 6.25% | 8.36% | 7.00% | 7.75% | 8.03% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.82% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
RNP vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RNP and UTF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNP has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to UTF (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNP dropped -86.93% vs UTF's -72.62%.
UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNP and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer