RNP vs. UTF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RNP (Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, RNP returned 8.37%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for UTF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

RNP vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNP achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RNP has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 8.37%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.

RNP

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -2.78%
• YTD: 5.10%
• 6M: 7.04%
• 1Y: -2.00%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: 3.08%
• 10Y*: 8.37%

UTF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 13.65%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNP vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.	5.10%	2.57%	11.88%	7.73%	-19.95%	32.84%	3.31%	43.14%	-9.46%	19.65%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	16.34%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	42.74%	-9.87%	34.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RNP and UTF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2004	0.52

The correlation between RNP and UTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RNP : $963.36M UTF : $2.62B
EPS RNP : $3.11 UTF : $6.79
PE Ratio RNP : 6.46 UTF : 3.98
PEG Ratio RNP : 0.02 UTF : 0.03
PS Ratio RNP : 6.42 UTF : 6.76
PB Ratio RNP : 0.97 UTF : 0.92
Total Revenue (TTM) RNP : $149.86M UTF : $387.16M
Gross Profit (TTM) RNP : $180.36M UTF : $388.42M
EBITDA (TTM) RNP : $141.38M UTF : $765.72M

Return for Risk

RNP vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNP

RNP Risk / Return Rank: 33
RNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
RNP Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RNP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 69
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNP vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNP	UTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	1.11	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	1.59	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.19	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	1.33	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	2.71	-3.07

RNP vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNP Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNP and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNP vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNP drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNP and UTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNP	UTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.93%	-72.62%	-14.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.24%	-10.33%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.71%	-21.06%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.19%	-30.28%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.68%	-52.53%	-4.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-1.31%	-4.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-10.35%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	5.05%	+0.45%

Volatility

RNP vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.41%. This indicates that RNP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNP	UTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	2.41%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	8.37%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.27%	12.42%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	18.28%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.26%	23.36%	+0.90%

Dividends

RNP vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

RNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than UTF's 6.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.	8.13%	8.22%	7.81%	8.10%	13.26%	5.20%	6.52%	6.25%	8.36%	7.00%	7.75%	8.03%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.96%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNP and UTF in my portfolio?

RNP and UTF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNP or UTF?

RNP has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to UTF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNP dropped -86.93% vs UTF's -72.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.