RNMBF vs. VOO
RNMBF (Rheinmetall AG) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, RNMBF returned 65.24%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for VOO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RNMBF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNMBF achieves a -40.80% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 7.53% return.
RNMBF
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -24.62%
- YTD
- -40.80%
- 6M
- -40.71%
- 1Y
- -49.58%
- 3Y*
- 61.68%
- 5Y*
- 65.24%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
RNMBF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBF Rheinmetall AG | -40.80% | 189.47% | 106.03% | 62.49% | 112.89% | 16.07% | 8.13% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 7.53% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNMBF and VOO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNMBF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
RNMBF
VOO
RNMBF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNMBF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.30 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.32 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.26 | 10.21 | -12.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNMBF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNMBF drawdown since its inception was -53.57%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBF and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNMBF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.57% | -33.99% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.57% | -8.90% | -44.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.57% | -18.69% | -34.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.57% | -24.52% | -29.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.54% | -3.73% | -49.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -3.68% | -5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.98% | 2.02% | +19.96% |
Volatility
RNMBF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) has a higher volatility of 22.56% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.76%. This indicates that RNMBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNMBF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.56% | 4.76% | +17.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.64% | 9.78% | +31.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.07% | 12.40% | +37.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 16.90% | +33.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.16% | 18.01% | +31.15% |
Dividends
RNMBF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
RNMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than VOO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBF Rheinmetall AG | 1.26% | 1.48% | 1.92% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 19.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNMBF and VOO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBF has higher volatility (22.56%) compared to VOO (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNMBF dropped -53.57% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNMBF and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer