RNMBF vs. NVDG.F

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F).

Performance

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RNMBF Rheinmetall AG	-7.87%	189.47%	106.03%	62.49%	24.87%
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR	-5.49%	35.40%	159.49%	239.31%	-40.96%

Different Trading Currencies

RNMBF is traded in USD, while NVDG.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NVDG.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNMBF achieves a -7.87% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG.F's -5.49% return.

RNMBF

• 1D: 5.57%
• 1M: -16.04%
• YTD: -7.87%
• 6M: -26.89%
• 1Y: 20.08%
• 3Y*: 81.73%
• 5Y*: 87.16%
• 10Y*: —

NVDG.F

• 1D: 5.92%
• 1M: -5.02%
• YTD: -5.49%
• 6M: -6.43%
• 1Y: 66.56%
• 3Y*: 78.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNMBF

RNMBF Risk / Return Rank: 55
RNMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RNMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RNMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RNMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RNMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

NVDG.F

NVDG.F Risk / Return Rank: 76
NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NVDG.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NVDG.F Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NVDG.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NVDG.F Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNMBF	NVDG.F	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.41	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	1.97	-1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.25	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	3.04	-2.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	7.39	-5.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNMBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNMBF and NVDG.F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNMBF	NVDG.F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	1.41	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	0.92	+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between RNMBF and NVDG.F is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Dividend Comparison

RNMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than NVDG.F's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RNMBF Rheinmetall AG	1.61%	1.48%	1.92%	2.96%	3.43%	19.20%
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.08%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNMBF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum NVDG.F drawdown of -64.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBF and NVDG.F.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNMBF	NVDG.F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-60.32%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.51%	-20.33%	-11.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.70%	-15.92%	-11.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-16.88%	+8.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.44%	9.05%	+4.39%

Volatility

RNMBF vs. NVDG.F - Volatility Comparison

Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) at 13.33%. This indicates that RNMBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDG.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNMBF	NVDG.F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.69%	13.33%	+2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.30%	33.43%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.37%	47.09%	+3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.21%	63.26%	-14.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.54%	63.26%	-14.72%

Financials