RNEM vs. EDOG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) and EDOG (ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - RNEM tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index while EDOG tracks the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RNEM returned 5.70%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for EDOG. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RNEM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EDOG.

Performance

RNEM vs. EDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than EDOG's 4.93% return.

RNEM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.02%
• 6M: 1.40%
• YTD: 3.95%
• 1Y: 9.33%
• 3Y*: 6.73%
• 5Y*: 5.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.46%

EDOG

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 4.11%
• 6M: -1.88%
• YTD: 4.93%
• 1Y: 17.31%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 5.78%
• ALL TIME*: 4.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	$61.67K	$61.90K	$58.74K
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	$35.85K	$33.48K	$54.35K

RNEM vs. EDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	3.95%	15.58%	-1.47%	23.43%	-8.75%	6.16%	-8.16%	12.76%	-9.34%	11.97%
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	4.93%	22.59%	1.70%	11.58%	-10.50%	11.71%	7.99%	13.26%	-16.52%	9.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RNEM and EDOG is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.69

The correlation between RNEM and EDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNEM vs. EDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNEM	EDOG
Financial Services	36.0%	8.0%
Basic Materials	13.8%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	8.5%	9.8%
Energy	6.5%	13.5%
Technology	6.5%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	10.3%
Healthcare	4.5%	10.8%
Industrials	4.1%	11.6%
Utilities	3.4%	8.1%
Real Estate	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

RNEM vs. EDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNEM

RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 29
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 28

EDOG

EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 43
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNEM vs. EDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNEM	EDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.09	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	1.58	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.21	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	1.63	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	3.56	-1.25

RNEM vs. EDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the EDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNEM and EDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNEM vs. EDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum EDOG drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and EDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNEM	EDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.38%	-44.29%	+5.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-10.73%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.09%	-15.29%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.41%	-26.54%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	-6.61%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.23%	-11.18%	+1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	4.90%	-0.86%

Volatility

RNEM vs. EDOG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNEM	EDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	3.19%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.89%	14.06%	-3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	16.04%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	15.40%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	17.35%	-0.21%

RNEM vs. EDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EDOG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNEM vs. EDOG - Dividend Comparison

RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than EDOG's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	4.90%	4.50%	6.55%	6.53%	5.07%	4.11%	2.60%	4.93%	5.37%	2.89%	2.97%	4.55%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	2.28%	2.75%	3.45%	1.63%	2.99%	3.20%	3.01%	2.85%	2.85%	2.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNEM and EDOG in my portfolio?

RNEM and EDOG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNEM or EDOG?

EDOG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to RNEM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNEM dropped -38.38% vs EDOG's -44.29%.

Which ETF is better, RNEM or EDOG?

On 5-year performance, EDOG leads with 6.42% vs 5.70% for RNEM. On fees, EDOG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNEM or EDOG?

Over the 5-year period, EDOG has performed better with a 6.42% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNEM or EDOG?

EDOG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNEM or EDOG?

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.28% for RNEM.

What is the main difference between RNEM and EDOG?

RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.60% for EDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.