RNDV vs. VTI
RNDV (US Equity Dividend Select ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - RNDV tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RNDV returned 9.28%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for VTI. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RNDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
RNDV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.72% return.
RNDV
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.73%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
RNDV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF | 16.69% | 14.27% | 11.05% | 9.77% | -7.55% | 28.99% | 5.51% | 27.34% | -7.11% | 9.90% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.72% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 11.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNDV and VTI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between RNDV and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RNDV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RNDV
VTI
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
RNDV
VTI
Healthcare
RNDV
VTI
Financial Services
RNDV
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
RNDV
VTI
Industrials
RNDV
VTI
Consumer Defensive
RNDV
VTI
Energy
RNDV
VTI
Communication Services
RNDV
VTI
Utilities
RNDV
VTI
Real Estate
RNDV
VTI
Basic Materials
RNDV
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNDV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
RNDV
VTI
RNDV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNDV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.24 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 14.94 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNDV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.38 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.74 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.51 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
RNDV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNDV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.44% | -55.45% | +18.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -8.92% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.70% | -19.30% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -25.36% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.26% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -8.03% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.93% | +0.86% |
Volatility
RNDV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.90%. This indicates that RNDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNDV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 2.90% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 9.13% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 12.17% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 17.40% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 18.30% | +0.57% |
RNDV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RNDV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF | 2.33% | 2.70% | 2.55% | 3.10% | 2.52% | 1.95% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 4.09% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNDV and VTI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNDV has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to VTI (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNDV dropped -37.44% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.80% vs 9.28% for RNDV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNDV.
RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
RNDV tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNDV and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer