PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMUNX vs. OPGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMUNX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than OPGSX's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RMUNX has underperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 3.76%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


RMUNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.17%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
3.76%

OPGSX

1D
-3.03%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
0.41%
6M
6.66%
1Y
52.64%
3Y*
37.05%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
1.78%0.82%2.37%9.85%-15.09%6.83%5.84%13.22%8.89%3.69%
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
0.41%131.03%13.05%6.35%-16.86%-2.75%36.15%46.37%-13.15%17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RMUNX and OPGSX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.04

The correlation between RMUNX and OPGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMUNX vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMUNX
RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

OPGSX
OPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
OPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
OPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMUNXOPGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.07

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

5.29

+0.70

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMUNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the OPGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMUNX and OPGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMUNXOPGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.39

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.47

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.25

+0.79

Drawdowns

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum OPGSX drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and OPGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMUNXOPGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.55%

-80.04%

+43.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-29.01%

+25.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.10%

-29.01%

+18.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

-47.09%

+25.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.81%

-47.09%

+25.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-24.67%

+22.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-29.29%

+26.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

10.85%

-9.16%

Volatility

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) is 1.68%, while Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that RMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMUNXOPGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

13.46%

-11.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

35.95%

-32.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

43.13%

-38.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

33.57%

-26.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

32.89%

-26.89%

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMUNX vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison

RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than OPGSX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
0.43%0.43%0.86%0.81%0.45%3.56%1.55%0.29%0.00%2.78%7.21%0.00%
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
3.13%5.30%4.81%3.77%3.03%3.24%3.32%3.43%3.40%4.34%6.01%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMUNX and OPGSX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPGSX has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to RMUNX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMUNX dropped -36.55% vs OPGSX's -80.04%.

RMUNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMUNX and OPGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer