OPGSX vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
OPGSX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 18, 1983. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OPGSX or GDXJ.
Key characteristics
| OPGSX | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.64% | 28.51% |
| 1Y Return | 30.20% | 37.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.66% | 7.52% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.55% | 6.73% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.48% | 4.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.47% | 36.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -79.63% | -88.66% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.63% | -63.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPGSX and GDXJ is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, OPGSX achieves a 25.64% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 28.51% return. Over the past 10 years, OPGSX has outperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 8.48%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPGSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
OPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than GDXJ's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.65% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 3.56% | 1.55% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 3.63% | 13.03% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPGSX drawdown since its inception was -79.63%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPGSX and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) is 9.52%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 11.86%. This indicates that OPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.