OPGSX vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
OPGSX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 18, 1983. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009.
Performance
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 6.89% | 131.03% | 13.05% | 6.35% | -16.86% | -2.75% | 36.15% | 46.37% | -13.15% | 17.17% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 10.08% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPGSX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 10.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OPGSX having a 18.10% annualized return and GDXJ not far behind at 17.88%.
OPGSX
- 1D
- 6.42%
- 1M
- -19.81%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 19.86%
- 1Y
- 93.74%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -19.21%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 125.16%
- 3Y*
- 49.66%
- 5Y*
- 23.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPGSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OPGSX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
OPGSX
GDXJ
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPGSX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 2.47 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 2.63 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 3.77 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 13.05 | +2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPGSX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.59 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.40 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.08 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between OPGSX and GDXJ is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
OPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than GDXJ's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.40% | 0.43% | 0.86% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 3.56% | 1.55% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 2.78% | 7.21% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPGSX drawdown since its inception was -80.04%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPGSX and GDXJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPGSX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.04% | -88.66% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.01% | -32.92% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.09% | -51.76% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.09% | -57.77% | +10.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.81% | -19.81% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.33% | -60.90% | +31.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 9.51% | -2.13% |
Volatility
OPGSX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) is 16.75%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 19.46%. This indicates that OPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OPGSX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.75% | 19.46% | -2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.48% | 42.52% | -7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.40% | 50.91% | -7.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.09% | 40.57% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 44.46% | -11.47% |