PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMUNX vs. PDINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Putnam Diversified Income Trust (PDINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with RMUNX at 1.50% and PDINX at 1.50%. Over the past 10 years, RMUNX has outperformed PDINX with an annualized return of 3.73%, while PDINX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.


RMUNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.76%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
3.30%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
3.73%

PDINX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.50%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
1.50%0.82%2.37%9.85%-15.09%6.83%5.84%13.22%8.89%3.69%
PDINX
Putnam Diversified Income Trust
1.50%7.48%5.92%4.55%-4.00%-6.94%-0.25%12.27%-1.38%6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RMUNX and PDINX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.25

The correlation between RMUNX and PDINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMUNX vs. PDINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMUNX
RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PDINX
PDINX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PDINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PDINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and Putnam Diversified Income Trust (PDINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMUNXPDINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.75

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

2.58

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.81

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.30

10.51

-7.21

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMUNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PDINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMUNX and PDINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMUNXPDINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.75

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.20

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.89

+0.15

Drawdowns

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum PDINX drawdown of -43.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and PDINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMUNXPDINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.55%

-43.44%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-1.96%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.10%

-11.25%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

-14.30%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.81%

-18.27%

-3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-2.59%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.55%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

0.52%

+1.17%

Volatility

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to Putnam Diversified Income Trust (PDINX) at 1.19%. This indicates that RMUNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMUNXPDINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

1.19%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

2.30%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

2.93%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

8.09%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

6.69%

-0.69%

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PDINX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMUNX vs. PDINX - Dividend Comparison

RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than PDINX's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDINX
Putnam Diversified Income Trust
3.97%5.17%18.88%6.35%4.59%3.71%3.75%4.17%5.35%5.61%5.35%4.89%
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
3.14%5.30%4.81%3.77%3.03%3.24%3.32%3.43%3.40%4.34%6.01%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMUNX and PDINX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMUNX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to PDINX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMUNX dropped -36.55% vs PDINX's -43.44%.

PDINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMUNX and PDINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer