RMUNX vs. SMLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF).
RMUNX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on May 14, 1986. SMLF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 28, 2015.
Performance
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund | -1.80% | 0.82% | 2.37% | 9.85% | -15.09% | 6.83% | 5.84% | 13.22% | 8.89% | 3.69% |
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 1.08% | 12.30% | 16.33% | 19.99% | -12.19% | 26.53% | 8.38% | 21.56% | -8.42% | 12.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMUNX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than SMLF's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RMUNX has underperformed SMLF with an annualized return of 3.60%, while SMLF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.
RMUNX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
SMLF
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMUNX vs. SMLF — Risk / Return Rank
RMUNX
SMLF
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMUNX | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | 1.02 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.21 | 1.55 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.56 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 6.74 | -7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMUNX | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 1.02 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.41 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.49 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMUNX and SMLF is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Dividend Comparison
RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than SMLF's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund | 3.17% | 5.30% | 4.81% | 3.77% | 3.03% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.43% | 3.40% | 4.34% | 6.01% | 6.55% |
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 1.17% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, smaller than the maximum SMLF drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and SMLF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMUNX | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.55% | -41.89% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -14.59% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.81% | -26.28% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.81% | -41.89% | +20.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -5.66% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -6.68% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 3.38% | +0.46% |
Volatility
RMUNX vs. SMLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) is 1.69%, while iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that RMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMUNX | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 7.09% | -5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 13.36% | -10.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.49% | 22.67% | -14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 21.14% | -14.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 21.75% | -15.78% |