PortfoliosLab logo
RMUNX vs. SMLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RMUNX and SMLF is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RMUNX vs. SMLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMUNX:

-0.25

SMLF:

0.23

Sortino Ratio

RMUNX:

-0.38

SMLF:

0.38

Omega Ratio

RMUNX:

0.94

SMLF:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

RMUNX:

-0.25

SMLF:

0.13

Martin Ratio

RMUNX:

-0.96

SMLF:

0.40

Ulcer Index

RMUNX:

3.05%

SMLF:

8.63%

Daily Std Dev

RMUNX:

8.84%

SMLF:

23.97%

Max Drawdown

RMUNX:

-36.54%

SMLF:

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

RMUNX:

-9.26%

SMLF:

-12.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMUNX achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly lower than SMLF's -4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, RMUNX has underperformed SMLF with an annualized return of 3.23%, while SMLF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.


RMUNX

YTD

-4.80%

1M

-0.38%

6M

-5.45%

1Y

-2.16%

3Y*

1.64%

5Y*

1.05%

10Y*

3.23%

SMLF

YTD

-4.40%

1M

6.20%

6M

-11.28%

1Y

4.66%

3Y*

10.69%

5Y*

15.08%

10Y*

9.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RMUNX vs. SMLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMUNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMUNX vs. SMLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMUNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMUNX is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMLF is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMLF is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMLF is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMLF is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMLF is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMLF is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMUNX vs. SMLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RMUNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the SMLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMUNX and SMLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RMUNX vs. SMLF - Dividend Comparison

RMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than SMLF's 1.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
4.46%4.11%3.78%3.64%3.25%3.29%3.23%3.40%4.78%6.01%6.56%11.00%
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
1.40%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.32%1.39%1.16%0.93%0.78%0.79%0.00%

Drawdowns

RMUNX vs. SMLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMUNX drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, smaller than the maximum SMLF drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMUNX and SMLF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RMUNX vs. SMLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) is 1.64%, while iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that RMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...